General Electric's largest and most profitable business is GE Capital, its financial arm. This has been true for a decade and is likely to be true into the indefinite future. GE Capital is a huge lender, trader and debt underwriter. Its business is very much akin to Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Lehman, Bear Stearns, and probably much riskier. The business also has a riskier lending profile than Citibank or Bank of America without the less risky bank deposit and money management revenues that their commercial banking operations bring. It is impossible for an outsider, or a reader of GE's financials to have any idea what GE Capital owns at any given moment, but it is reasonable to assume that it is sitting on tons of subprime mortgage backed securities and tons of other increasingly less valuable collaterialized debt securities that it is unable to trade or make a market in. The banks are getting destroyed for being "unknowable" in these times when credit spreads are widening. The price-earnings ratios are falling to 7 or 8 times current earnings. GE Capital is equally unknowable, yet GE's stock is still trading over 19 times current earnings with a market cap over $400 billion.
I've tried to figure out what else in Jeff Immelt's portfolio might justify such a premium in valuable over other banks. We can instantly rule out the plastics and lighting businesses. These businesses aren't growing dramatically and wouldn't justify at 19 P/e multiple on a stand-alone basis.
Appliances? They make a good oven, but no 19 P/e valuation there. Consumer electronics? I don't think so. Media and entertainment? Not with Rupert Murdoch about to slice the $300 million that CNBC grosses annually to screeds. The water business? A very small part of GE's business, and I can buy Watts Water or another water pure play at 15 times current earnings and with better growth prospect.
Admittedly, the aircraft engine business is good as is the worldwide infrastructure business, but then wouldn't I want to buy Boeing, United Technology, Honeywell or Fluor to play these things at similar multiples. Moreover, GE's has a competitive advantage in these areas through GE Capital's vendor financing of much of their sales. So, a sale can be booked as a sale, but the buyer becomes a debtor to the company. If you think like me that the emerging markets may be the next shoe to fall, then GE Capital vendor financing of these sales becomes a significant liability for the overall company as this sales don't get off the books for years.
For years, GE has argued that that their diversified business model means that the entire business should trade at a premium. I see a bunch of anemic businesses bound into one - none even justifying on a standalone basis a 19 times multiple. Plus, I believe that in the current environment and with the risks that GE Capital provides throughout the company, GE's non-financial business should trade at a discount to their peers. So, I think that the entire unknowable company should be trading at a similar multiple to other institutions that generate most of their business through finance. In other words, GE is dramatically overvalued.
Full disclosure: I am long Boeing, Morgan Stanley and Watts Water and short GE.
Comments
Mkhan
August 07, 2007
The market has always given GE, and by extension, Ge Capital, a significant premium to other bank stocks. I believe that it is highly unlikely that is going to change. I believe that Immelt is a solid leader - infinitely better than Nardelli who was the other choice to succeed Welsh.
Is this review helpful? Yes:0 / No: 0
Dave Lloyd
August 07, 2007
Everything that you have written here is correct, but the market (analysts, media, investors) aren't going to wake up tomorrow and see GE for what it is. This thing is going to continue to go up until earnings falter, and I am not sure that they will anytime soon with the dollar so weak. I'd cover.
Is this review helpful? Yes:0 / No: 0
JessicaRH
August 14, 2007
Good points, but I wouldn't short. I agree with the comment by Dave Lloyd.
Is this review helpful? Yes:0 / No: 0
Ralph Smith
August 22, 2007
It is absolutely staggering that there has been a complete resetting of credit risk and that GE, the largest holder of credit risk throughout the spectrum, is simply unaffected.
Is this review helpful? Yes:0 / No: 0
Peter Than
August 31, 2007
I agree. GE is probably a huge holder of subprime and other ridiculously bad credit.
Is this review helpful? Yes:0 / No: 0
Bob Troiani
September 20, 2007
Don't fight the tape!
Is this review helpful? Yes:0 / No: 0
Stan Cleveland
October 19, 2007
You all seem to be overlooking the fact that GE saw the Subprime mess coming and unloaded Genworth Financial which carried the riskiest assets. GE has the ability to profit during market disturbances because it has the deep pockets to weather the storms and pick up prime assets cheap. GE has done this over and over during the last 20 years and will continue to do it for the next 20. If your a patient investor your probably looking at the best entry point for this stock in 20 years!!
Is this review helpful? Yes:0 / No: 0
tim clinton
October 20, 2007
If it is a bank stock, than it sure is outperforming the others.
Is this review helpful? Yes:0 / No: 0
Walter Thatcher
October 30, 2007
Good article. Immelt has been complaining for awhile that his company isn't getting the valuation that it deserves. I agree. It should be trading lower. More transparency would lower the valuation, so management continues to obfuscate.
http://stocksforallseasons.blogspot.com
Is this review helpful? Yes:0 / No: 0
terry
October 08, 2008
Wow, couldn't have predicted this better!
Is this review helpful? Yes:0 / No: 0
Add your Comment
or use your BestCashCow account